How should high quality engagement be recognised and rewarded?

High quality schemes should be rewarded simply by securing on-going funding. So many fantastic projects fall by the wayside in favour of ‘pilot’ schemes that stand little chance of sticking around in the long term. It seems we have a preference for the ‘new’ over the ‘tried and tested’ format, with the result that any associated learning is at risk of disappearing. Rewards should focus on recognising outstanding projects, rather than individuals, and should reflect the fact that it is not just scientists who are doing the engagement, but rather a cadre of professional people who are carving out a distinct career path in ‘public engagement’.
Dr Gail Cardew – Director of Programmes, Royal Institution

What’s your view? Join the debate in the comments here, via our response form, Facebook or your own blog or website.

Leave a Reply